Solving Fiscal Cliff Math Might Come Down To Two

Fresh off his re-election, a politically fortified President Obama summoned the top four congressional leaders to the White House on Friday for the first of what could be many rounds of talks for a deal to avert fiscal calamity.

The meeting was part of the opening moves to keep the nation from sailing over the so-called "fiscal cliff" — those across-the-board tax hikes and deep spending cuts set to kick in at year's end.

In welcoming the quartet of lawmakers, Obama struck a conciliatory note.

"Our challenge is to make sure that we are able to cooperate together, work together, find some common ground, make some tough compromises, build some consensus to do the people's business," he said.

But any deal reached to prevent the fiscal plunge may prove a hard sell on Capitol Hill.

Revenue Is 'On The Table'

The president had already made clear at his news conference Wednesday that he has one bottom line as this high-stakes bargaining begins.

"What I have told leaders privately as well as publicly is that we cannot afford to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy," he said.

Obama took that same stance two years ago, but ultimately relented. This time, backed by a renewed mandate and polls that support his position, he says that won't happen.

And House Speaker John Boehner, who scotched a revenue-raising deal with the president last year, emerged from Friday's meeting on a very different note.

"To show our seriousness, we've put revenue on the table, as long as it's accompanied by significant spending cuts," he said.

Fighting A Hike

Boehner did not spell out just what kind of revenue he's willing to consider. But Democrats — from Obama on down — say revenue-raising should start by letting the marginal tax rates for the top two income brackets go back on Jan. 1 to what they were during the Clinton administration.

That's fighting talk for hard-line House Republicans, including Georgia's Phil Gingrey.

"I certainly would not be in favor of any so-called millionaires' tax, whether it was imposed at the $250,000, $500,000, $1 million, $5 million level. It's a gimmick, and it's not solving the problem," he says.

Kansas House Republican Tim Huelskamp, who just got re-elected to a second term promising not to raise anybody's taxes, says a tax hike on the wealthiest won't help the economy.

"It might make people feel better — that's what the president's about, making people feel better — but at the end of the day, it's going to cost us jobs," he says.

But there are other Republicans in the House who seem resigned to accommodating a wave of public opinion in favor of taxing the rich more. One of them is Georgia Rep. Jack Kingston. He is not willing to draw a line when it comes to raising some tax rates.

"I think that there is flexibility in that, and we maybe can argue about what kind of revenues for this, what kind of revenues for that," he says. "We do believe that there's more of a spending problem than a taxing problem, but we're also ready to talk."

Who Holds The Upper Hand?

There's speculation that the nearly 30 House Republicans who are either retiring or lost their seats in the election could join Democrats to provide the votes needed for a fiscal package raising taxes on the wealthy.

Oklahoma House Republican Tom Cole says such a scenario is unlikely, and what a deal would really need to pass would be Boehner's blessing.

"There will not be some group of 30 or 40 Republicans flaking off to vote against the majority of their conference," he says. "At the end of the day, the negotiation, in terms of the House, is principally between the speaker and the president."

It may come down, in the end, to a test of which of those two men now holds the upper hand in this negotiation — and which of them is willing to risk going off the fiscal cliff rather than give in.

Copyright 2012 National Public Radio. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.