Northern Virginia Contractor Pays $5.2M Abu Ghraib Settlement | WAMU 88.5 - American University Radio

WAMU 88.5 : Morning Edition

Filed Under:

Northern Virginia Contractor Pays $5.2M Abu Ghraib Settlement

Play associated audio

A Virginia defense contractor accused of conspiring to torture detainees at the infamous Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq has reached a settlement in the case, the Associated Press reports.

Defense contractor L-3 Services has paid $5.28 million to 71 former inmates held at the infamous Abu Ghraib prison and other U.S.-run detention sites between 2003 and 2007.

The settlement in the case against L-3 Services, now a subsidiary of Engility Holdings Inc. of Chantilly, Va., marks the first successful effort by lawyers for former prisoners at the detention centers to collect money from a U.S. defense contractor. The former prisoners' lawsuits allege torture, including rape, beatings and guns aimed at the prisoners.

In 2006, L-3 provided more than 6,000 translators in Iraq under a $450 million dollar per year contract. Another contractor, Arlington-based CACI, is expected to go to trial over similar allegations this summer.

NPR

WWI Diaries Of Poet Siegfried Sassoon Go Public For First Time

Nearly a dozen notebooks and journals by the author, who fought in the British Army during the war, are being released to coincide with the centenary of the start of the conflict.
NPR

Cheap Eats: Cookbook Shows How To Eat Well On A Food Stamp Budget

A Canadian scholar was unimpressed with the cookbooks available for people on food stamps in the U.S. So she decided to come up with her own set of tips and recipes for eating well on $4 a day.
WAMU 88.5

McDonnell Corruption Trial: Defense Zeroes In On Star Witness' Credibility

Defense attorney William Burck is focusing on inconsistencies in what Jonnie Williams told investigators as well as his stock dealings.
NPR

Simmering Online Debate Shows Emoji Is In The Eye Of The Beholder

A report from a local Philadelphia TV station is re-igniting a debate and getting people all up in arms. (Or should we say, up in hands?)

Leave a Comment

Help keep the conversation civil. Please refer to our Terms of Use and Code of Conduct before posting your comments.