Looking For Lung Cancer With A Yearly X-Ray Doesn't Reduce Deaths | WAMU 88.5 - American University Radio

NPR : News

Filed Under:

Looking For Lung Cancer With A Yearly X-Ray Doesn't Reduce Deaths

The drive to test healthy people for common cancers rests on the idea that finding malignancies early can trigger life-saving treatment. But the evidence that some of the tests will actually reduce mortality is sometimes lacking or is less than clear cut for the people who'll get tested.

Now, a big federally funded study finds that yearly chest X-rays to look for lung cancer aren't worth doing because they don't save lives. The findings were just published online by JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Some previous studies of regular chest X-rays for screening suggested they weren't very helpful, though the evidence wasn't conclusive. Now there's an answer: Don't bother.

In the latest study, more than 154,000 people, ages 55 to 74, got either four annual chest X-ray or regular medical care without a screening X-ray. Patients were checked for as long as 13 years after getting the X-rays.

Among the more than 77,000 people who got X-rays, 1,213 died from lung cancer. For those in an equal-size group who didn't get the screening test, the death toll was 1,230. Statistically, there was no difference.

The types of lung cancer were pretty much the same in both groups.

An accompanying editorial says the study "provides convincing evidence that lung cancer screening with chest radiography is not effective. The study is important for putting this question to rest...."

Now is there another way to find lung cancer that would make a difference? Recent findings from another big study suggested that low-dose CT scans could help detect cancers in older people with a history of smoking versus a chest X-ray.

The approach remains controversial, especially as some hospitals and imaging centers tout inexpensive scans to all comers.

Update 4:19 p.m.: I asked the American Cancer Society for comment on the findings. In an emailed statement, epidemiologist Robert A. Smith, director of cancer screening for the group, had this to say:

Back in the late 1980s there was general agreement that the lung cancer screening trials that were done in the 1970s had serious methodological limitations....

All in all, while the results were null, there were a long list of concerns that led to a lack of confidence in the findings. [National Cancer Institute] investigators thought there was a real chance that there was a true benefit of 10-15 percent..., so they included a lung cancer screening arm....

Keep in mind that the NCI funded most of the trials in the 1970s. So, the goal here was to try and do a trial that would produce results that would stand up to scrutiny. It is true that many people thought the question had been resolved by the old trials, but they really were a bad lot, which is why the NCI was prepared to address the question one more time.

I think what we observed in the run up to use of spiral CT was an attempt to cast doubt on the value of lung cancer screening with any technology, which meant dressing up the old trials with new credibility.

Copyright 2011 National Public Radio. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

NPR

Iraq's Artists Defy Extremists With Bows, Brushes And A Low Profile

The musicians and artists of Baghdad work under a government that prefers religious festivals to classical concerts. But with a little cunning, they're finding ways to keep the arts alive.
NPR

'Language Of Food' Reveals Mysteries Of Menu Words And Ketchup

Linguist Dan Jurafsky uncovers the fishy origins of ketchup and how it forces us to rethink global history. He also teaches us how to read a menu to figure out how much a restaurant may charge.
NPR

Tommy Boggs, Influential Lobbyist, Dies At 73

Boggs changed the lobbying profession by recognizing how power in Washington was becoming more diffuse.
NPR

Smartphones Are Used To Stalk, Control Domestic Abuse Victims

Cyberstalking has transformed domestic abuse in the U.S. Tracking tools called spyware make it cheap and easy for someone to monitor a partner secretly, 24 hours a day.

Leave a Comment

Help keep the conversation civil. Please refer to our Terms of Use and Code of Conduct before posting your comments.