Jury Rules In Bribery Case Against Former Va. State Delegate | WAMU 88.5 - American University Radio

WAMU 88.5 : News

Filed Under:

Jury Rules In Bribery Case Against Former Va. State Delegate

Play associated audio
Former Virginia Delegate Phil Hamilton represented the Newport News area for more than 20 years.
Wikimedia Commons
Former Virginia Delegate Phil Hamilton represented the Newport News area for more than 20 years.

Original post: The bribery and extortion case against a former Virginia state delegate is in the hands of a jury in Richmond -- after closing arguments concluded earlier today.

Phillip Hamilton is accused of soliciting a job as director of a teacher training center at Old Dominion University while working to secure state funding for the project.

He sponsored a $500,000 budget amendment for the center in 2007, then worked as the center's director for two years.

Hamilton represented the Newport News area for more than 2 decades, and was vice chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee before losing his reelection bid in 2009.

A prosecutor argued the evidence of guilt is overwhelming, while a defense attorney told the jury the government did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

NPR

A Tome Of Peruvian Food, By Its Most Acclaimed Ambassador

Gaston Acurio is the world's premiere cheerleader for Peruvian cuisine, and he's just written a cookbook. It's called Peru: The Cookbook, and has 500 recipes — including more than 20 kinds of ceviche.
NPR

A Tome Of Peruvian Food, By Its Most Acclaimed Ambassador

Gaston Acurio is the world's premiere cheerleader for Peruvian cuisine, and he's just written a cookbook. It's called Peru: The Cookbook, and has 500 recipes — including more than 20 kinds of ceviche.
NPR

Florida Lawmakers Convene Special Session To Wrangle Budget Issues

Republicans who control the Governor's mansion and both chambers of the state legislature are at an impasse over the issue of health care and whether to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.
NPR

Threatened Online? Supreme Court Says Prosecutors Must Prove Intent

Justices declined to delineate exactly what sort of evidence could prove that an online post — such as "took all the strength I had not to ... slit her throat" — was intended to spark fear.

Leave a Comment

Help keep the conversation civil. Please refer to our Terms of Use and Code of Conduct before posting your comments.